CRM Buyer
Part of the ECT News Network
01/06/11 5:00 AM PT If you're sitting around waiting for best practices, it means that someone else -- probably a competitor -- is out there working to develop them. With the speed that customer relationships are evolving, can you wait to copy your competitors? Are you willing to spot them a huge lead? If you're not willing to answer the bell now, will you really be able to catch up later?
"3 Payment Security Myths and Their Truths" - Payment Security goes beyond PCI Compliance. Understand 3 key myths and how they impede success, and learn an approach to Enterprise Payment Security to achieve successful Tokenization and PCI Compliance, without touching sensitive payment data. Learn more.
I've heard the excuses -- most famously, "we need to understand the ROI on this before we launch any projects." That's not a great excuse, because ROI calculators are out there and ready for use, even for social CRM. Great or not, too often the excuses win out.
You've probably heard the mantra that CRM needs executive buy-in to succeed. That's true -- so true, in fact, that the opposite is also true. New trends in CRM need executive apathy and fear to fail.
The people working in the trenches are constantly receiving anecdotal evidence of the value of social CRM in helping with sales, marketing and service. The service team sees only too clearly how deficiencies in their processes are holding them back. The people in the field are relying on mobile devices for many things -- and they know that a capability to use their business software on their mobile devices could make them both more productive and more effective.
So the front-line people are ready, and the technology is ready. What's keeping many businesses from launching a CRM revolution? I like to call it "C-level fear."
Far too many executives operate from a position of fear when it comes to the customer. They continue to debate the idea that the customer is now in control of the relationship, because the loss of control is scary to them.
As a result, they soft-pedal emerging technologies, kicking the can down the road to a time not when their organizations are ready for change -- because that time is now -- but to a time when they have come to grips with how the customer is changing, and how that changes the expectations and duties of a C-level executive.
They're afraid of making investments that don't pay off, and they'd rather find themselves too far behind the competition than seem too far ahead of the technology curve.
The great default is the ROI argument. If an initiative can't produce visible ROI in a short period of time, it doesn't get a go-ahead. Investments should have payoffs, but the way those payoffs are evaluated should be fair and realistic.
A pilot program whose evaluation criteria doom it to failure from the start is not a good investment. An evaluation of an underfunded initiative after six months is not fair to those involved in it.
Worst of all, once a half-baked, half-hearted program based around social media, in-depth service or mobile technologies fails, the executives plagued by "C-level fear" can then use those doomed projects as evidence that all such projects will fail.
Another great dodge is the idea of waiting for best practices to develop. Best practices don't just evolve on their own -- they come about when someone actually tries something and then adjusts what they're doing.
Thus, if you're sitting around waiting for best practices, it means that someone else -- probably a competitor -- is out there working to develop them. With the speed that customer relationships are evolving, can you wait to copy your competitors? Are you willing to spot them a huge lead? If you're not willing to answer the bell now, will you really be able to catch up later?
If you want to succeed -- especially as a C-level executive -- you need to be audacious. You need to realize what the reality is around customer relationships, accept what you have control over, and act decisively to improve those things. What you should not do is default to excuses that merely mask the fact that you're uncomfortable with change.
One audacious move: If you're a C-level executive, get out of the office and talk to the front-line people about these ideas. Find out if social CRM, mobile CRM, new service metrics, or new types of analytics would solve their problems. If the answer is yes, you need to realize that you will not be alone in any effort to improve your CRM efforts -- if you're brave enough to respond by initiating change.
CRM Buyer columnist Chris Bucholtz blogs about CRM at Forecasting Clouds. He has been a technology journalist for 15 years and has immersed himself in the world of CRM since 2006. When he's not wearing his business and technology geek hat, he's wearing his airplane geek hat; he's written two books on World War II aviation, and his next two are slated for publication in 2010. Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Christopher J. BucholtzNext Article in Strategy
A CRM Lesson From Sesame StreetDecember 30, 2010
As it tries to penetrate into small and even medium-sized businesses, the CRM industry often focuses on the totality of what CRM can do instead of the specific problems it can solve. It's critical to break down CRM for these audiences in a way that introduces them to the trees first, then the forest.
More by Christopher J. Bucholtz
5 Great Gifts Your CRM Users Will LoveDecember 23, 2010
Nothing is more frustrating than seeing or hearing things from customers that can impact your business, and then discovering your processes are so rigid that you can't find a way to put that information to work. If social media are not effectively integrated into marketing, sales and service processes, pearls of wisdom from customers are never strung together to improve things. The Lessons Antique Computers Can Teach About CRM
December 16, 2010
Back in the 1940s, if someone said, "We should figure out how artillery shells travel through the air," technologists could take a stab at it. However, without the details of the question -- like wind, projectile shape, etc. -- the results were likely to be poor and the investment would probably be viewed as a waste. Is that much different than what happens in a lot of poorly defined CRM deployments today? Breaking the Tech Terminology Barrier
December 09, 2010
If a vendor has a different definition of a technology than its intended customers, that disconnect can cost the customers millions in potential savings and can cost the vendors their businesses. This isn't just a problem for PRM. There are other technologies that orbit CRM -- the terms "performance management," "cloud computing," and even "social CRM" are often met with blank stares when you speak to business people.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar